Assisted dying: the debate


Video details

The perfect philosophical position supposes a situation where there is a guarantee that the law will never be abused and that the means of suicide will implicate no one other than the person who desires to end her/his life. This has been used in the past as a means of suggesting discrimination against those who are physically incapable at the end and can again lead people to make a more rushed decision than is necessary to ensure that they do not become trapped within this situation. What are the fundamental underlying core (neither medical nor legal) arguments for and against assisted dying/suicide and can we truly debate them in a purely philosophical manner unencumbered by social constructs?

Featuring

You might also like

  • Resources

    The Royal Society of Edinburgh launched the Young Academy of Scotland (YAS) in November 2011, to bring together the country’s most dynamic young leaders. It is the only Young Academy in the UK and is based on a model developed by the national academies in Germany and Holland. Although it has become part of a…

  • Resources

    Professor Dame Anne Glover details the findings of the RSE Post-Covid-19 Futures Commission and how Scotland can emerge stronger from the pandemic.

  • Resources

    Spring 2021 edition of the RSE’s ReSourcE Magazine. Read expert opinions from RSE Fellows on the pandemic’s impact on their work, and more.